Appeals
Ninth Circuit Victory in California: No Duty to Indemnify for Insured’s Fraud
Christian Nagy, Al Alikin, Will Hadikusumo, and Nick Directo secured a victory in the matter of Primary Color Systems, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, 2024 WL 489171 (9th Cir. Cal. 2024) aff’d 654 F. Supp.…
Christian Nagy, Al Alikin, Will Hadikusumo, and Nick Directo secured a victory in the matter of Primary Color Systems, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, 2024 WL 489171 (9th Cir. Cal. 2024) aff’d 654 F. Supp. 3d 982 (C.D. Cal. 2023), before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In its opinion, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision of the U.S. Central District Court to dismiss the Complaint against Hiscox with prejudice. Al Alikin, Will Hadikusumo, and Nick Directo drafted the winning briefs in the trial court in which Hiscox’s Motion to Dismiss was granted and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment was denied.
The case involved a claimant who was a former employee of the insured, Primary Color. The claimant alleged that Primary Color fraudulently promised him an equity stake in the company to induce him to stay at the company. Nearly six years later, upon separating from Primary Color, the employee demanded his equity stake, and the company denied ever making such a promise. The matter proceeded to arbitration, where the employee was awarded a $850,000 judgment plus costs and fees against Primary Color based on a finding of fraud.
Primary Color sought indemnity from Hiscox for the award arguing that its promise to grant equity were covered “employment-related misrepresentations” that was not excluded under the exclusion for deliberate fraudulent acts because there was no finding of “deliberate” fraud as opposed to regular, plain-vanilla fraud. Hiscox defended Primary Color in the arbitration but denied indemnity because the company’s actions and conduct triggered the deliberate fraudulent act exclusion. Primary Color sued Hiscox for breach of contract and bad faith in the present coverage action.
In our Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, we argued that all fraud is “deliberate” by virtue of the very nature of a fraud claim and a finding of fraud by the arbitrator. Further, we argued that Insurance Code section 533, which prohibits indemnification for willful acts, also applies to completely bar coverage. The trial court agreed and dismissed the action with prejudice.
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed, holding that the district court correctly determined that Hiscox had no contractual obligation to indemnify Primary Color for the fraud claim. Furthermore, regarding Primary Color’s new argument that reliance on the underlying arbitration findings violates the California Supreme Court’s decision in Vandenberg, the Ninth Circuit correctly noted that Primary Color waived this argument by failing to raise it at the trial court level.
More Successes
More Successes
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Property Loss Suit
FMG attorneys Phil Savrin and Bill Buechner secured summary judgment in favor of an insurance company that had been sued for millions of dollars in claimed property losses. The lawsuit was filed in 2019 and took several years to…
Georgia Court of Appeals Victory
FMG attorneys Dana Maine, Kevin Stone and Katie Taylor obtained a win in the Georgia Court of Appeals in a tort and breach of contract case against a governmental entity and its development authority. The plaintiff, a subsidiary…
Defense Verdict in Massachusetts Wrongful Death Case
FMG partners Michael J. Griffin and Richard L. Nahigian recently won a medical malpractice wrongful death case filed by the estate of a nursing home resident. The plaintiff’s estate alleged that the 52 year-old wheelchair bound resident died after…
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Landmark ADA Emotional Distress Case
Wayne Melnick and Michael Hill prevailed before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in a case of first impression regarding whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act permits recovery for emotional-distress damages. The…
Illinois Appellate Court Upholds Pre-Accident Waiver
Michael Sanders, Brad Purcell and Sophie Stevanovich obtained a favorable decision from the Illinois Appellate Court affirming the use of exculpatory clauses. Plaintiff broke her ankle after falling while top rope climbing at an indoor facility. Plaintiff…
Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Sovereign Immunity Dismissal
Sun Choy and Wes Jackson obtained an appellate victory for the City of Roswell in a case involving an officer’s use of spike strips to stop a high-speed pursuit. The officer involved parked his car…
Ohio Appellate Court Upholds Summary Judgment Based on Known Danger
Doug Holthus and Cara Wright received an affirmed summary judgment in Ohio’s Third District Court of Appeals in favor of FMG’s client, a local school district board of education, in a slip and fall case.…
Florida Court of Appeals Reverses Lower Court and Enforces Engagement Agreement
Robert Klein and Chris Fraga prevailed in having Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal reverse a prior order incorrectly denying a motion to dismiss for improper venue based on their attorney client’s engagement agreement. Based…
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Affirms Decision Regarding Statute of Repose
FMG attorney Sean Riley prevailed on appeal before the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in a matter involving claims asserted against an architecture firm arising from the design and construction of the County’s jail. In 2021,…
Victory in Georgia Court of Appeals to Enforce Arbitration Clause Property Dispute
FMG attorneys Michael Freed and George Green prevailed in an appeal of a trial court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration. The case arose from a developer’s sale of two adjacent residential lots to…
Eleventh Circuit Appeal, Secures Qualified Immunity for Georgia Officers
FMG attorneys Michael Freed and Sun Choy obtained a victory in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of seven Athens-Clarke County police officers who were granted qualified immunity in a Fourth Amendment excessive…
Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Section 1983 Civil Rights Case
Cynthia O’Donnell and Shane Miller successfully obtained a judgment from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of a case alleging violations of Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights. The case involved FMG’s defense of…